UML reverse engineering with Generics class/methods (#1614)

hi, I bring you an umpteenth bug (again!) concerning this time the way the generic methods are generated from Java code (I have not tested for other languages)

here 2 sample class:

public class Addition extends Paire {

public Addition(Object a, Object b) {

super(a, b);

// TODO Auto-generated constructor stub

}

public <T> Paire<T> accepter(Paire<T> v) {

return v;

}

}

and

public class Paire<T> {

T premier;

T second;

public Paire(T a, T b) {

premier = a;

second = b;

}

public T getPremier() {

return premier;

}

public T getSecond() {

return second;

}

}

the UML reverse engineering genere a empty class despite the correct syntax (I checked with eclipse)

here somme useful link:

https://www.tutorialspoint.com/java/java_generics.htm

files samples

https://tinyurl.com/r7qhbdh

I'm happy to use such powerful software but

frankly, I'm tired of discovering that version in version of new bugs .....

thank you for doing the neccessaire